MATATO Advocates for Targeted Israeli Travel Ban Amid Legislative Deliberations

  • Maldives
  • World
  • Travel
  • Politics
PUBLISHED 28 November 2024

The Maldives Association of Travel Agents and Tour Operators (MATATO) has expressed support for a selective travel ban targeting Israeli government leaders and military personnel, opposing a blanket ban on all Israeli travelers. MATATO’s President, Abdulla Giyas, articulated this stance during discussions with Parliament’s 241 Committee, which is reviewing an amendment to the Immigration Act proposing the ban.


Giyas emphasized that MATATO members back the selective banning of Israeli passports rather than a complete prohibition. He noted that Israel has boycotted the Maldives and does not represent a significant market for Maldivian tourism. He also highlighted complications arising from dual passport holders, including Russians and Palestinians with Israeli passports.


Giyas warned of potential repercussions if a full ban were enforced, referencing claims by the Maldivian government that the country's reduced credit rating by international financial institutions was linked to this move. He further cautioned against backlash from powerful nations like the U.S., which openly supports Israel. Instead, Giyas endorsed a focused ban on Israeli government officials, a measure that MATATO fully supports.


The Guest House Association of Maldives has echoed this position, aligning with MATATO’s recommendations.


Banning Israeli passports is a campaign pledge by President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu and has been approved by his cabinet. The government has requested Parliament to enact legislative amendments to implement the ban. Meanwhile, opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) MP Meekail Naseem has proposed a broader amendment to prohibit Israeli travelers entirely.


The 241 Committee is currently evaluating the bill and plans to gather input from political parties, government institutions, and tourism industry stakeholders. The ruling People's National Congress (PNC), holding a parliamentary supermajority, anticipates a decision on the matter by February next year.


The issue continues to generate debate within the Maldives, as stakeholders deliberate the potential impact on tourism, international relations, and the economy.