A mobile phone has been confiscated from an individual who took a photo of President Muizzu and his family while they were shopping at a mall in Singapore. The image, which captured the President and his family during a personal trip, went viral on social media last week, generating considerable public interest.

Upon the individual's return to the Maldives, police intervened at the airport and seized the mobile phone. This action underscores the government's approach to managing privacy concerns surrounding public figures, even during their private activities. As the situation unfolds, it raises important discussions about the balance between public interest and personal privacy for those in leadership roles.

Critics, particularly from the opposition, have voiced concerns that this incident infringes on freedom of expression, especially in the digital age where sharing public photos has become commonplace. They argue that taking photos of public figures in public spaces should not be considered an infringement on privacy, and such government actions may set a concerning precedent for personal liberties and media freedom. This debate highlights the ongoing tension between upholding privacy rights and ensuring freedom of expression in an increasingly interconnected world.